March, 2010 - Vol. 18 No. 3
Senate jobs bill includes employer tax incentives, new
reporting and withholding requirements for offshore accounts
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., unveiled a
scaled-down jobs creation package late February 11 that includes tax incentives
for employers who hire displaced workers and an extension of the increased
small-business expensing limits under section 179. The Hiring Incentives to
Restore Employment (HIRE) Act would be paid for in part through provisions to
curb offshore tax evasion and delay the effective date of the worldwide interest
allocation election.
Reid has indicated that the Senate will vote on the bill
sometime after the week-long Presidents Day recess which begins on February 15.
The bill does not provide for extensions of expired business
and individual tax incentives that were part of draft jobs legislation released
earlier in the day by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., and
ranking Republican Charles Grassley of Iowa, nor does it include revenue offsets
from the Baucus-Grassley draft that would codify the economic substance doctrine
and exclude “black liquor” from eligibility for certain renewable energy
credits.
“No one can dispute we have a jobs bill,” Reid said in
remarks to reporters about the revised legislation. “We’re not going to confuse
this with tax extenders.”
Reid indicated that the Senate would take up extenders
legislation separately after the recess.
Employment tax incentives
The HIRE Act includes two significant incentives for hiring
and retaining workers. First, it would exempt from payroll tax those wages paid
by employers (not including federal, state, or local government employers)
beginning after the date of enactment and ending on December 31, 2010. This
incentive would be available to employers hiring individuals who:
- Begin employment after February 3, 2010, and before
January 1, 2011;
- Are employed for no more than 40 hours during the two
months prior to the new employment; and
- Were not employed to replace another employee for
reasons other than voluntary or for-cause termination.
Second, the bill would increase for employers the
current-year business credit under section 38(b) by $1,000 for each worker who
was employed on any date during the taxable year for at least 52 consecutive
weeks, and whose wages during the last 26 weeks equaled at least 80 percent of
wages for the first 26 weeks of the period.
Other business incentives
The bill also includes provisions that would:
- Extend through 2010 the increased section 179 expensing
limit of $250,000 and investment phase-out of $800,000 originally enacted in
the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 and
- Allow qualifying issuers of tax credit bonds the option
to utilize the direct-subsidy Build America Bond structure for bonds issued
after the date of enactment.
Foreign account compliance
On the revenue side, the HIRE Act incorporates a number of
provisions intended to curb offshore tax evasion that were approved as part of
House extenders legislation in December. (These provisions, which would raise an
estimated $9 billion over 10 years, are based on the Foreign Account Tax
Compliance Act introduced last October by Baucus and House Ways and Means
Committee Chairman Charles Rangel, D-N.Y.)
Reporting certain foreign
accounts – The bill would add several new
code sections devoted to the enforcement of information reporting. The new
sections would impose 30 percent withholding on income from U.S. financial
accounts or assets held by a foreign financial institution unless that
institution enters into and complies with an agreement with Treasury to report
U.S. account/asset holders and other related account information.
The agreement would require the financial institution to
request waivers (from account holders) of any applicable foreign secrecy law and
to close any account for which the holder refuses to provide such a waiver.
Reporting would not be required for account holders that are public
corporations, tax-exempt organizations, banks, real estate investment trusts, or
regulated investment companies.
Similar withholding requirements would apply to nonfinancial
foreign entities, such as corporations or trusts.
Withholding would not be required for income connected with
U.S. business and taken into account under sections 871(b)(1) or 882(a)(1).
These provisions would be effective for payments made after
December 31, 2012.
Individual reporting
requirement – Under a new section 6038D,
an individual holding an interest in a foreign financial asset in any taxable
year would be required to attach a disclosure statement to his or her tax return
for that year if the aggregate value of all such assets exceeds $50,000.
Applicable assets would include financial accounts, foreign stock and
securities, and other financial instruments and contracts.
Failure to disclose for any taxable year would subject the
individual to a $10,000 penalty. If the individual were to continue such failure
after notification by the Secretary, an additional $10,000 penalty would apply
for each 30-day period following the 90-day period after the Secretary mails the
notice. The “continuation” penalty would not exceed $50,000. The bill would
provide a penalty exception for reasonable cause.
Any entity “formed or availed of for purposes of holding”
such assets would be treated as if the entity were an individual.
These requirements would be effective for taxable years
beginning after the date of enactment.
Penalties –
The bill would amend section 6662 to make the underpayment
penalty applicable to understatements attributable to undisclosed foreign
financial assets. For such understatements, the penalty imposed by section 6662
would be 40 percent, rather than 20 percent. The bill also would extend the
statute of limitations on assessments to six years for significant omissions of
income.
No disclosure requirement for
material advisors – In a change from the
original Rangel-Baucus proposal, the bill would not require reporting of
material assistance or advice with respect to the acquisition of an interest in
a foreign entity.
PFICs and trusts –
The bill would require any person who is a
shareholder of a passive foreign investment company (PFIC) to file an annual
return, regardless of whether the shareholder has gain from the sale of PFIC
stock.
Section 679 would be amended to provide that a trust would be
treated as having a U.S. beneficiary even if the U.S. person’s interest is
contingent. A trust would also be treated as having a U.S. beneficiary if any
person has the discretion to determine beneficiaries, unless the trust
identifies the class of persons to whom distributions may be made and
none of those persons are U.S. persons. If a U.S. person transfers property to a
foreign trust, there would be a presumption that a foreign trust has a U.S.
beneficiary unless the person discloses all required information and satisfies
other requirements of section 679.
The penalty under section 6677 for failure to report foreign
trusts would also be amended to impose a minimum $10,000 penalty for failing to
file the required information return.
Dividend equivalent payments –
In addition, the legislation would define
dividends to include substitute dividends, dividend equivalent payments made
pursuant to specified notional principal contracts, and similar payments, and
would require withholding. This provision would be effective 180 days after
enactment.
Other revenue offsets
The Hire Act would delay the effective date of the worldwide
interest allocation election through 2019. Under current law the election would
be available after December 31, 2017.
The bill also would raise revenue through a variety of
provisions affecting the Highway Trust Fund.
— Joel Deuth
Tax Policy Group
Deloitte Tax LLP
The information contained is for
general purposes only. The views expressed in this article are those of the
author and do not constitute tax advice from or reflect the view of Deloitte
& Touche LLP. Deloitte & Touche LLP assumes no responsibility with
respect to assessing and/or advising the reader as to the respective tax
consequences arising from circumstances relating to the reader's particular tax
situation. It is recommended that the reader consult with their own tax advisor
with regard to the application of the tax laws and resulting tax consequences
relating to the reader's particular situation.